Listen Live
Listen Live
HomeNewsTransparency, public input recommended as Widdifield decision is revisited

Transparency, public input recommended as Widdifield decision is revisited

After an extensive investigation, Ontario Ombudsman Paul Dubé is making recommendations to the Near North District School Board.

The Ombudsman is recommending the board “issue a public report that sets out the evidence trustees relied on in making their decision, and take a new vote on the matter only after the public has been given a chance to comment. He also makes several recommendations to ensure the board no longer holds closed meetings that violate the Education Act.”

Dubé’s report called on the NNDSB to “revisit its decision to close North Bay’s Widdifield Secondary School after his latest investigation determined that the board failed to follow a fair and transparent process.”

The Ombudsman finds the “contentious” September 2017 decision to close Widdifield instead of Chippewa (identified as the preferred school to close during the ARC process) was the “result of actions that were unreasonable, unjust, wrong and contrary to law.” According to the office of the Ombudsman, 11 complaints about the Widdifield decision were received in the spring of 2018.

- Advertisement -

Dubé said NNDSB cooperated fully with the investigation and “has accepted all 14 of his recommendations to improve transparency and rebuild public trust.”

In his report, entitled Lessons Not Learned, Dubé writes, “The board’s failure to follow a rigorous and transparent process damaged its relationship with stakeholders.”

The report reveals the board was advised to implement such measures in the wake of a similar situation in 2013, but never did. “The credibility of the entire consolidation process and closure process was undermined by the board’s failure to share relevant information, and ultimately generated public distrust in its final decision.”

The investigation reviewed the various steps the board took in considering consolidation of its three North Bay secondary schools, beginning in 2016. By June 2017, trustees were considering a committee’s recommendation that a different school be closed. “There was no information publicly available to explain why, by September, Widdifield had become the target for closure,” Mr. Dubé notes.

His report reveals that trustees held a closed-door “workshop” meeting on July 13, 2017, where the schools and other matters were discussed – and they received an email six days later, informing them that an architect had confirmed expanding Widdifield was not feasible. None of this was ever made public, he points out: “The community was deprived of the opportunity to respond or be consulted on the new information considered by trustees in the summer of 2017.”

The board has begun implementing some of the Ombudsman’s recommendations, including training its members on meeting procedures under the Education Act and notifying the public of upcoming meetings via the school board website. “I commend the board for its commitment to enhancing the transparency of its decision-making processes. I look forward to receiving updates on the implementation of my recommendations,” Dubé said.

In the board’s response, appended to the Ombudsman’s report, Chair Jay Aspin stated, “We are committed to moving forward with improved policies, guidelines, and procedures to increase transparency, fairness and accountability to our students, stakeholders and constituents.”

The board announced in September 2018 that it was putting the school consolidation and closure of Widdifield Secondary School on hold pending a decision from the Ministry of Education regarding capital funding.

This is the Ombudsman’s second formal investigation into a school board matter since his mandate was expanded to include school boards as of September 1, 2015. To date, the Ombudsman has received more than 3,300 complaints about school boards, almost all of which have been resolved informally, often by referral to the appropriate local authorities, or through informal contact between Ombudsman staff and board officials.

The Ombudsman is an independent, impartial officer of the Ontario Legislature who resolves and investigates public complaints about more than 1,000 public sector bodies, including all provincial ministries, agencies, corporations, boards, commissions and tribunals, child protection services and French language services, as well as municipalities, universities and school boards. The Ombudsman received 27,419 complaints in 2018-2019. He does not overturn decisions of elected officials or set public policy but makes recommendations to ensure administrative fairness, transparency and accountability. The Ombudsman’s recommendations have been overwhelmingly accepted, resulting in public sector improvements affecting millions of Ontarians.

- Advertisment -
- Advertisment -
- Advertisement -

Continue Reading